Recent American bombardment in the South American nation and the seizure of its president have renewed worry regarding Washington's designs on Greenland. Followers of the former president's political movement have reportedly focused on the strategically important island following the events in the southern hemisphere.
Only hours following the start of the Venezuelan operation, a well-known right-wing commentator, who is married to a high-ranking presidential adviser, shared a symbolic image. The graphic showed Greenland draped with the stars and stripes, with the single-word caption: "SOON."
This blatant threat to claim the resource-abundant land, which is a member of the NATO alliance, triggered swift and firm criticism from Danish officials.
"We are strong partners and should keep work together as such. US security is also Greenland’s and Denmark’s security," stated the Danish ambassador to the United States. "Our nation and the United States collaborate to guarantee security in the North."
The ambassador further pointed out that the kingdom had substantially increased its defence spending recently, earmarking a substantial sum specifically for Northern and North Atlantic security. "And yes, we expect complete recognition for the territorial integrity of the Kingdom of Denmark," he emphasized.
The tensions were further exacerbated by the recent naming of a Southern governor as a special envoy to Greenland. The governor had publicly thanked the commander-in-chief, saying it was an "honour" to work in a volunteer capacity to "make Greenland a part of the US."
After the events in Venezuela, this representative praised the president's actions, linking it to the wider "fight against narcotics."
Ever since assuming office, the American leader has consistently unnerved European partners with his stated interest in Greenland. The island is considered vitally important for defence and potential resource extraction. It currently hosts the northernmost US air base.
In a significant media appearance, the leader declined to exclude the use of armed action to acquire Greenland. This position comes during intensifying great-power competition in the Arctic. "I don't rule it out. I don't say I'm going to do it, but I don't rule out anything... We need Greenland very badly," he remarked.
He characterized Greenland as having a "tiny amount of people, which we’ll take care of, and we’ll value them... But we need that for global security."
In response to this constant "rhetoric" of intent, Denmark's intelligence service took the unprecedented step last month of classifying the United States as a "potential threat."
The leaders of Denmark and Greenland delivered a unified and forceful statement: "We have said it very clearly before. Now we say it again... You cannot take over other countries."
Public opinion in Greenland shows a nuanced sentiment. While a overwhelming percentage of the island's residents seek independence from Copenhagen, there is also little to no appetite to become part of the United States. The territory has had the option to seek sovereignty for many years.
Some analysts are now re-evaluating the possibility of such a action. One thinktank director focusing in military analysis conceded she had previously dismissed the sabre-rattling but was "currently not so sure."
"It wouldn't be that hard for the US to station a couple hundred or a few thousand troops on Greenland, and it's not clear to me who could intervene about it," she concluded.
Morgan is a tech journalist and electronics hobbyist with over a decade of experience in reviewing gadgets and sharing DIY guides.